For our first lab assignment in GIS4006: Computer Cartography, we were tasked with choosing two maps to evaluate: one well-designed and one poorly designed. We were offered a folder full of maps to choose from, which I utilized.
I originally wanted to choose my own well-designed map from the web, as our choice of map should reflect the personalized cartographic aesthetic we strive to achieve by the end of this course. A considerable amount of time was spent searching the web for a map that suits what I view as aesthetically pleasing, while also having a substantive objective of personal interest. However, while going through the process of evaluation (using a provided template), I realized that, out of excitement, I had overlooked the fact that my map was missing multiple essential map elements, thereby deeming my map choice inappropriate for this assignment.
Anyway, here are the maps I chose to critique along with their synopsis. 😊
Well Designed:
The design of this map meets its intended aim of illustrating the largest ancestral populations in the United States by county and state. It effectively balances substantive and aesthetic objectives, appealing to a wide audience, including both the general public, as well as more knowledgeable individuals such as researchers in sociology, anthropology, and so on.
Map Design Principles Supporting Overall Grade (Well-Designed):
o Map Substantial Information (Tufteisms 1, 2, 3, 4, and 20): The map clearly presents ancestral population data, allowing viewers to easily interpret the information. The use of contrasting colors enhances the visibility of different demographic groups, making it straightforward to identify trends and patterns.
o Effectively Label Maps (Tufteisms 7 & 8): Despite some text being smaller than ideal, the overall legibility is acceptable. Labels are clear, and the use of intuitive symbology aids in understanding the map's content. (Note: The inset maps lack titles which I believe are necessary here.)
Aesthetic Appeal:
o Color Palette: The aesthetically pleasing colors create a visually harmonious map that is easy on the eyes, enhancing the overall viewing experience.
o Arrangement of Elements: The layout of the map is well-organized, with elements positioned in a way that facilitates easy navigation and understanding.
o Inset Maps: The inclusion of inset maps provides additional context and information about areas outside the continental United States, contributing to the map's overall effectiveness and aesthetic value.
Poorly Designed:
The design of this map falls short of effectively meeting its intended aims of illustrating the various dialects of American English across different regions in North America. Instead of providing clarity and insight, the map ends up being cluttered and confusing.
Map Design Principles Supporting Overall Grade (Poorly-Designed):
o Minimize Map Crap (Tufteisms 11, 14, 15, 16, and 18): The color pallet, symbology, layout... everything about this map is completely overwhelming. The cartographer (Rick Aschmann) has tried to deliver entirely too much information to his audience in one place. I would say this map is the epitome of “map crap.” (No offense Mr. Aschmann. I realize you are a hobbyist and NOT a cartographer.)
o Effectively Label Maps (Tufteisms 7 & 8): This map contains an excessive number of symbols and labels, which are too small and poorly placed, making them difficult to read. As a result, the map becomes almost impossible to follow.
Areas for Improvement:
o Simplify the Color Scheme: Reduce the number of colors used and choose a more cohesive palette. Limit each dialect area to distinct, easily recognizable colors that contrast well without overwhelming the viewer.
o Reorganize Symbols and Labels: Ensure that symbols are larger and more legible, with clear explanations. Labels should be strategically placed to avoid overlap and should be easily readable.
o Improve Layout and Balance: Reassess the overall layout to create a more balanced and organized design. Align elements logically and ensure that the map has clear borders to differentiate between areas effectively. This may be better suited in a series of maps instead of a single map.
For fun, I'd like to include the map I originally intended to use, and what I like about its design.
.png)
This map does a great job of providing an overview of Downtown San Diego, focusing on hotel locations and points of interest, which adds real value for tourists. The color palette is vibrant yet clean, creating a fun and inviting feel. Key features like the numbered hotel points and illustrated symbols stand out, making it easy to read without feeling cluttered. I also appreciate the innovative scale “ring” and clear typography, which enhance its user-friendliness. Overall, the map strikes a nice balance between being visually appealing and functional, making it easy for someone with little experience in the area to navigate.
No comments:
Post a Comment